William and Robert Malet
William Malet was a companion of William the Conqueror and fought in the Battle of Hastings.
Robert was his son. Below is from Wikipedia:
Malet was the son of William Malet, and inherited his father's great honour of Eye in 1071.
This made him one of the dozen or so greatest landholders in England. According to the Domesday book
he held 221 manors in Suffolk,
32 in Yorkshire, eight in Lincolnshire, three in Essex, two in Nottinghamshire, and one in Hampshire.[1]
He also inherited the family property in Normandy.
Top
Ownership of Thunderlow in 1086
The Domesday Survey of 1086 records Thunderlow as
"The land of Aubrey de Vere".
It is my suspicion that William Malet was the original "owner" of Thunderlow. The following from
The Manors of Suffolk, with respect to Lavenham, a quote:
The error has been perpetuated and appears in that useful Gazetteer of White published in 1885.
Lavenham having
formed one of the lordships of Malet is an entire delusion. Shortly after the Battle of Hastings William
the Conqueror rewarded his brother-in-law Aubrey de Vere with the grant of this and other manors.
This Aubrey de Vere
lies buried in the Priory of Colne in Essex which he and his wife founded, as appears by the following
inscription given by Weever:
" Here lyeth Aubery the first Earl of Guines sonne of Alphonnes de Vere, the whyche Aulbery was the
founder of this place and Bettrys hys wyf syster of kyng William the Conquerour."
The question is: "why did William the Conqueror grant Lavenham and other manors to de Vere?".
See link below - Malet Family History - caught in the "power struggle".
English Heritage Battlefield Report: Hastings 1066
The involvement of William Malet in the Battle of Hastings and why he was granted much land by William in Suffolk
and surrounding areas, why he may have had this land confiscated from him at a date soon after.
Having thus regained his superiority, the duke returned to the main battlefield,
and he could not gaze without pity on the carnage, although the slain were evil men, and although it is good and
glorious in a just war to kill a tyrant. The bloodstained battle-ground was covered with the
flower of the youth and nobility of England. The two brothers of the king were found near
him, and Harold himself stripped of all badges of honour could not be identified by his face,
but only by certain marks on his body. His corpse was brought into the duke's camp, and
William gave it for burial to William, surnamed Malet, and not to Harold's mother, who
offered for the body of her beloved son its weight in gold. For the duke thought it unseemly
to receive money for such merchandise, and equally he considered it wrong that Harold
should be buried as his mother wished, since so many men lay unburied because of his
avarice.
Mallett Family History
This website turns up if you search for background on the Mallet family. The site is (was) run by Bob
Mallett, Ottawa,
Canada. The note at the footer of the webpage says 2007, so it appears not to be maintained currently.
Bob Mallett describes his research phylosophy and brought my attention to the IGI,
and index
formerly used by LDS.
Guillaume Malet at the Battle of Hastings
The name MALET is one of the most ancient of France : Guillaume Malet distinguished himself on the
battlefield of Hastings, in 1066. As a reward for his feats of arms, he was knighted by
William the Conqueror, and named Count of Suffolk.
His sons Robert and Durand Malet, knights as well, followed William Duke of Normandie in Conquest of England.
Wikipedia on the Battle of Hastings
Battle of Hastings
There is evidence that Malet fought on the Norman side at Hastings, regardless of any divided loyalties
that may have been caused by family ties. For instance, William of Poitiers wrote of King Harold's remains:
"His corpse was brought into the Duke's camp and William [of Normandy] gave it for burial to William, surnamed
Malet, and not to Harold's mother, who offered for the body of her beloved son its weight in gold."[3]
If Malet was at the Norman headquarters, immediately after the battle, it would be strong evidence
that he played a significant role in the Norman victory.