Quinquennial
Menu Quinquennial
 

The Quinquennial report

As a (former) member of The Friends of St. Mary the Virgin, Belchamp Walter support group this is my resource page.

The next Quinquennial report is July 2022. There have been discussions on what has been done and what can be done.
However, not much has been done! In particular is the case of the Flemish Stained Glass

The Medieval wall painting in St Mary the Virgin Belchamp Walter
Top

Work to be done

There are a number of items that I would put on a priority list (if I were still on the "Friends Group" - or had any influence):

In addition there are also a number or other points that need to be clarified or a decision made.

Interceptor Trap

" The Log Book, “The Church Wardens Year” and “How to Look After Your Church” obtained from the Diocesan Resources Centre (bookshop) or Church House Bookshop, Great Smith Street, London, SW1 "

Key to tasks in the report:

Priority M:
Maintainance and Further Investigations

Priority A:
Conditions that are a danger to the fabric or people if postponed. Works that should be completed within 12 months.

Priority B:
Works recommended during the next five years and should be completed before the next quinquennial review.

Priority C:
Works, which will become ‘B’ by the next quinquennial inspection.

Improvements I: Improvements and future desirable repairs or renewals.

Stained glass of St. Peter & St Michael the Archangel

This is a task which could easily be made a priority for the "Friends" group. I missed this window in our documentation of features for the "Friends".

Chancel 3.7 d)
Carefully clean the 17th C Flemish glass. Priority A:
Record with hi-definition photos – St. Peter & St Michael the Archangel

I originally thought that this was a depiction of St George and the Dragon

Points to clarify

The bells and ringing mechanism:

3.2 Belfry
d) The bells are “clocked” and the harness will crack the bells – new mechanism is preferable to preserve the bells. Priority I;
e) Fit new gudgeon pins and fittings to the bells. Seek a report & estimate from a bell hanger. Priority C:

The meaning of "clocked" needs to be explained. Does this mean how they are suspended or that they are rung by the means of the Ellacombe?

What "harness" is referred to here and how does this compromise the bells?

Having researched this further I am not sure that the bells should be rung again! The report written by Peter Woollam, Lichfield DAC Bell Adviser, seems to indicate that it is not just the chiming mechanism that is the issue but the whole bell frame needs to be replaced if the bells are ever rung again.

The Tortoise stove:

3.6 Nave:
a) The Tortoise stove is used for main services only – the asbestos cement pipe is noted in the Asbestos Register and is obvious also in the roof loft. Provide a black stove pipe with insulated stainless steel pipe through the loft for fire safety. Raise outlet to 600mm above the ridge. (Top section has blown away) Priority A:
b) Weld the stove top for draught control i.e. to prevent over heating; I assume fire guards are used. The pews are scorched.

The Tortoise stove is NOT used for "main services". It had been decided (although the advice not followed) that the stove not be lit until it was repaired, if this was what was decided to do with it.

If the stove is not used then the issue with the stove pipe goes away. This includes the extension of the "outlet to 600mm above the ridge". (This is not clear in the photo in the report - also I cannot see that the "Top section has blown away")

The stove top is severely rusted and already has many "blotched" welds in attempts to repair it. Any further welding will cause futher damage. The top needs to be re-cast. (see photograph in Q report)

4.3 Priority B: (2 - 5 years)

4.3 i)
Renew the embedded rusting expanding iron or steel waste pipe from the piscina with lead or copper and reface the wall.

4.3 a)
Restore the weathervane & cupola carpentry with access scaffolding from the ground or a flying scaffold. New board support under the chute.

Putlog Holes and "Gale Saver"

While it is agreed that the Putlog Holes need to be filled, as this would reduce the mess caused by birds entering the tower, a decision needs to be made on when and how this should be done.

I cannot find a reference to "gale savers", but I think this is obvious. (see photograph is Q Report "missing slats"

A Mobile App

3.6 l)
The wall paintings should be inspected by a conservator and light dusting may be recommended. Restored in 1964 by Prof. Eve Baker and stabilised in 1996. Priortity *
There maybe grants available to form interpretation display boards to encourage visitor understanding or an app directing smart phones to the Church web site and history - Priority I:

A mobile App would be a lot of work and beyond the current budget of the Church.

The Church does not have a website.

Old Flue Outlet

Explain!

General Description- from 2017 report

Reformatted for readability.

2.4 Grade 1 listed.
The 10th/11thC chancel was probably longer to the west forming the single cell church and if so, housed the 12thC font.
Nave 1320 originally with north tomb recess or chantry chapel 1324/5 of which a recess & inner elaborate porch remain.
Many exposed wall paintings 1330 possibly by Matthew Paris.
Tower 15thC, porch added.
Chapel removed and blocked in the 16thC and top of stair turret rebuilt.
17thC painted glass north chancel. 18thC north chancel door case, cupola, monuments and weathervane. Georgian tower clock. Georgian boundary wall at the roadside for carriages to approach the hall grand entrance. The 5th bell of 1712 cast in Sudbury by Thomas Gardiner. Stained glass windows added 1850’s. Mosaic reredos 1860.
The chancel east end may have been shortened at this time as the east wall and returns (up to visible cracks) was rebuilt by Rev. J.M. St Clere Raymond with architect, possiby J Cole who rebuilt the chancel arch 1857-8 (the cobble flintwork). Pulpit 1865 painted by George Washington Brownslow, a local artist. His memorial window 1876 by William Wailes. The east wall at this time fully covered with high Victorian wall paintings – some 16thC paintings remain exposed. Tortoise stove installed and still in use with furnishings and brick floors of the Victorian era.

While the general description does decribe the church of St. Mary's there are many inaccuracies in it. It would appear that the description was "cobbled" from other sources (not attributed)

The introduction from the Building Conservation Trusts article on the importance of church inspection.

The Appointment of Professionals for Quinquennial Inspections
An Introduction to Accreditation and Approval Systems

Jonathan Taylor


It is widely recognised that the inspection of historic churches requires specialist skills, but it is not always easy for non-specialists to determine which professionals have the skills required. Some professionals seem to qualify solely because they have always qualified, and it is likely that many continue to practice methods which are now known to damage historic buildings, simply because they have not been required to keep abreast of current developments.

QUINQUENNIAL INSPECTIONS

Most churches and chapels in Britain are inspected 'quinquennially', that is to say every five years. The Church of England introduced quinquennial inspections as a statutory requirement in 1955 through The Inspection of Churches Measure, and dioceses are required to maintain a fund to pay for them. Most other denominations and many secular organisations which are responsible for historic buildings now adopt a similar approach to inspections.

Quinquennial inspections involve a thorough survey of all aspects of a building's fabric and are intended to identify problems which have developed since the last time it was inspected and to establish priorities for repair to ensure the preservation of the fabric. Quinquennial inspections are generally frequent enough to catch problems before significant damage occurs.

In addition to the structure of the church building, chapel or other place of worship, Church of England quinquennial inspections may be required by the archdeacon to include works of art, artefacts and other articles of particular importance or value. Ruined churches and other churchyard ruins may also have to be included where designated jointly by the Council for British Archaeology and the Royal Commission on the Historic Monuments of England (now part of English Heritage), but as yet no proper survey has been carried out. Any trees in the churchyard covered by a tree preservation order must also be included.

The importance of regular inspections by architects and surveyors who specialise in the conservation and repair of historic buildings cannot be over-emphasised. Historic and 'traditional' structures deteriorate in a manner that is very different from modern buildings and it takes a specialist to correctly distinguish defects that require attention from the superficial results of the ageing process.

Links

Top

References:

  • The Appointment of Professionals for Quinquennial Inspections - https:// www.buildingconservation.com /articles/quinap/ quinap.htm
  • William Paton Buchan Sanitary Engineer Glasgow - https:// www.scottishbrickhistory.co.uk/ william-paton-buchan-sanitary-engineerglasgow/
  • David Whymark Architecture & Conservation - https:// www.suffolk-architects.com/
  • William Wailes - https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ William_Wailes
  • Lamb of God - East Window - https:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Lamb_of_God

Site design by Tempusfugit Web Design -

More