Mandeville and Botetourt
In my attempt to work out what was going on in the 13th Century and the activities of the Norman Barons and the apparent unrest that led to the drafting of Magna Carta I started to perform some "back-research" into spme of the names that I had come across to that point.
I started off with Mandeville and added Botetourt, as at that time I had some background on Botetourt and knew that Mandeville was associated with Belchamp Walter. Reviewing this page I am not sure of what my direction was.
As usual with the reseach into the history of the region of Belchamp Walter things are "about face". Taking some names for various sources the back-story is slowly filling in.
The de Vere family were part of this research. The association between a family name and a modern place-name is problematic
Earls/Counts
I am not sure where or why I came with up with this list:
- Hubert Walter
- Walter de Gray
- Henry de Loundres
- Guillaume II
- Amanieu de Genève
- Centule I of Astarac
- Gilbert de Clare, 5th Earl of Gloucester
- Geoffrey Fitz Peter, 1st Earl of Essex
- Aubrey de Vere, 2nd Earl of Oxford
Some of these are Magna Carter Barons (I need to cross-reference them back)
Feudal Barons and Barons by Writ Under the Crown
Wikipedia says:
Round on Geoff de Mandeville
» Monasticon, iii. 433. He founds the priory "pro anima Athelais^ primas uxoris mese, matris filiorum meorum jam defunctce ; " and « Lecelina domina uxor mea " is a witness to the charter. * It is necessary to check by authentic charters and other trustworthy evidence the chronicles printed in the Monasticon under Walden Abbey. One of these was taken from a long and interesting MS., formerly in the possession of the Eoyal Society, but now among the Arundel MSS. in the British Museum. This, which is only partially printed, and which ought to be published in its entirety, has the commencement wanting, and is unfortunately, very inaccurate for the early period of which I treat. It is this narrative which makes the wild misstatements as to the circumstances of the foundation, which grossly misdates Geoffrey's death, etc., etc. All its statements are accepted by Dugdale. The other chronicle, which he printed from Cott. MS., Titus, D. 20, is far more accurate, gives Geoffrey's death correctly, and rightly assigns him as wife the sister (not the daughter) of the Earl of Oxford, thus correcting Dugdale's error. It is the latter chronicle which Dugdale has misquoted with reference to the charge of the Tower.