Leigh on Sea, Essex
The Southend-on-Sea region and specifically Foulness Island, Great Wakering and Barling are of interest to me
as I grew up in Great Wakering and went to school in Ashingdon, North of Rochford, and Rayleigh.
Leigh, Foulness and Wakering were returned as seaports in 1565
Under Elizabeth the practice settled into a grant of five shillings per ton on all vessels over 100 tons.
In 1564-5, Leigh was returned as having thirty-one vessels, with thirty-two masters and owners,
230 mariners and fishermen.
Barling came next with twenty three vessels, fifteen masters and owners and forty-eight
mariners and fishermen.
Prittlewell had ten ships, fourteen masters and owners and thirty-six mariners and fishermen ;
South Benfleet, five vessels, with a similar number of masters and fifteen seamen; North Shoebury coming last
with one vessel and master and a crew of four.
Top
Southend-on-Sea and district historical notes By Burrows, John William 1909
The preface of the manuscript:
These Historical Notes have been gradually collected and written over a period of years. The primary intention in
presenting them to the public in book form is to counter the too prevalent and erroneous impression that
Southend and district possess little or nothing of interest relating to the past. This impression is probably
due to the absence of any book which gives in readable form, at a popular price, a sketch of the
history of the Borough and neighbourhood. The Author hopes in this Volume that need will, to some extent, be met,
and result in a growing appreciation of the unique and valuable
tradition of service which comes down to us from byegone days.
Many of the episodes have not been treated as exhaustively as they deserved, the aim in this respect having been to
indicate the lines upon which historical research should be undertaken. Particularly is this so in connection
with the water traffic of the Estuary, which has nowhere been discussed as fully as its importance demands.
In presenting a history of this town and Hundred, no matter how short, there are two authorities whom it is
essential to consult -- {Mr. T. Henton's "History of the Rochford Hundred" and
Mr. H. W. King's MS. Volumes and other contributions, now in the custody of the Essex Archaeological
Society.
Mr. King has rarely before been laid under contribution, and then only scantily.
It has been the Author's privilege to have unrestricted access to these papers.
Valuable information has also been afforded in the two Volumes which hare been published
of the " Victoria History of Essex."
Thanhs are expre.ed t {Mr. J. II. 'liurrcws, J.P., C.A.,
whose extensive knowledge of heal government has hern placed
ttngrwtgingly at disposal ;
\Ir.
'J^o/anJ 'Burrows, L/.D.,
liarruttr-at-Latc, by whose assistance much new and important
matter relating to this district is published for the first time ;
{Mr. H. H. 'Burrows for his advice in printing and
producing the book^; the Essex .Jrcha-ological Society; {Mr.
./. (j. H'right, Curator of Colchester {Museum; the late {Mr.
6. Z\L 'Boirajo, of the guildhall Library ;
SMr. 1(. Thilipson,
Secretary of the Tort of London .-futhority ;
fMr.-1. 'D. O 7'V,
Librarian at the War Office; Mr. ./. .////?;/, Secretary of the
Royal ?\umismatic Society ; the 'Director of (^rccn-.cich Hospital;
the {Manager of the "
(^hbe
"
newspaper ; the Manager of
the "Illustrated London AV-/,-" Messrs. Spink and Son; the
late and present 'Town Qlerkj of Southeiid ; the 'Borough
untant ({Mr.
.
Justices
8.
Tweedale) ; tfe f/r/'/t to the
('Mr. ./. J.-Irthy)
the
'Principal of the
Secondary 'Day School ({Mr. J. Hitchcock^) ; the Manager of
Southend H'ateiworks Qompany ({Mr.
(
.
S.
Bilham) ; the
Secretary of Southend (jas Company ({Mr. J. T. T(andall) ;
Councillor
^ 7. Osborne, Mr. Val. Mason,-"Mr. If. T.
Took, and {Mr. .
//. ole; and, lastly, to the Author's wife,
but for rthose kjnd/y interest and unwearying readiness to assist,
this )ror could not have been published